DoD photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Charles 
Abell, U.S. Navy Military Interdiction   Ops troops
from San Diego in Persian Gulf hunt for
sanctioned chlorine & infant formula
I
R A Q
a r c h i v e
IraqDaily re "water supply"
Turkey, Syria & Iraq water issues
& links
extremely comprehensive links from
Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq

Fed. American Scientists re Iraq
Vatican campaign against Iraqi sanctions

DIA Water Vulnerability Report
Cong.Staff Delegation rpt 3.00
UN FAO report 9.13.00
UK & ICC Tribunal 8.25.00
DEATH STATISTICS IN IRAQ
UN imposed economic sanctions in place since the end of Gulf War in 1991. Sanctions had little effect on policies of Iraqi Govt, chilling toll on civilian population. The Iraqi Ministry of Health estimates that 109,720 persons have died annually between August 1990 and March 1994 as a direct result of the sanctions.
• From The Children are Dying: Reports by UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Since Aug. 1990, 567,000 children in Iraq have died as a consequence of the sanctions.
• THE LANCET, Volume 346 Number 8988. Saturday 12.2.95. After the sanctions, there was two-fold increase in infant mortality and five-fold increase in under-5 mortality.
• The LANCET Volume 346, Number 8988. Saturday 12.2.95 There are 4,500 children under the age of 5 dying each month from hunger and disease. In Central/Southern Iraq, 27.5 percent of Iraq's three million children (some 900,000) are now at risk of acute malnutrition.
• UNICEF Report Due to the hazards of the water supply, government statistical office figures show 1,819 cases of typhoid fever in 1989 and 24,436 cases in 1994. Similarly, there were no reported cases of cholera in 1989, but 1,345 cases in 1994.
• 4/99 Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility effect of sanctions on Iraqi citizens, especially children. Intentionally defied sanctions with, visit, medicine, equipment & medical textbooks without required UN approval. or US travel permit.

9/5/00 PDF Human Rights Impact of Economic Sanctions on Iraq bkgd paper by Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights for ExecComm on Humanitarian Affairs U.K.

Russian Flight Departs For Baghdad
9.23.00  
AP

MOSCOW   In yet another apparent challenge to U.N. sanctions, a Russian airliner left for Iraq on Saturday with a soccer team, a musical group, businessmen and medical supplies. The flight, carrying 143 passengers and five tons of cargo, was the latest challenge to sanctions on Iraq, imposed after Saddam Hussein's army invaded Kuwait in 1990. A dispute over the controls has fractured the U.N. Security Council, some of whose members sharply disagree on the effectiveness of the sanctions. Russia did not ask permission for the flight from the U.N. sanctions committee, saying authorization was not required because the flight is humanitarian. A plane from France flew to Baghdad Friday without U.N. authority, and officials from Russia and France say more flights will follow. U.S. & Great Britain, meanwhile, insist that all humanitarian flights must get permission to fly to Iraq. They say passenger flights are an economic resource and a breach of the sanctions.
But Russia & France say the controls do not specifically ban passenger flights, and Russia's state-controlled airline Aeroflot is negotiating with Iraq on resuming flights to Baghdad. Russia & France are increasingly impatient with the sanctions regime. Russia is eager to resume lucrative oil contracts with Baghdad and wants Iraq to pay back some $8 billion in Soviet-era debt. U.N. resolutions require the sanctions to remain in place until Baghdad complies with demands to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction. For the past decade, travelers to Iraq have generally had to fly to Amman, Jordan, and then drive to Baghdad.
  more bear stories

Iraq, Russia Win Sanctions Battle
7.4.01  
AP

UN   Russia & Iraq won the latest battle on overhauling sanctions against the oil-rich Mideast nation as the U.N. Security Council extended the oil-for-food program. But the United States & Britain are adamant that the sanctions war isn't over yet. At the end of a 6 week campaign, Americans & British got 14 of the 15 council members to support key elements of their plan to lift most restrictions on civilian goods entering Iraq, tighten enforcement of an 11-year-old arms embargo and block lucrative Iraqi smuggling routes. But Russia, Iraq's closest ally on the council, remained staunchly opposed and threatened to veto the plan. So the Americans & British decided to indefinitely postpone a vote and simply extend the 4½ year-old program, which allows Iraq to sell unlimited quantities of oil on condition that the proceeds are spent on food, medicine & other essential goods.

After a day of wrangling over a reference to the U.S.-British plan in the resolution, which Russia opposed, the council voted unanimously Tuesday night on a five-month extension of the oil-for-food program. The vote came less than 6 hours before the current phase of the program was set to expire. To protest the proposed sanctions overhaul, Iraq halted its oil exports June 4. Even before the council vote Tuesday, the Iraqi military's Al-Qadissya newspaper called the extension "a victory for Iraq's rights.'' But Iraqi U.N. Ambassador Mohammed al-Douri declined to say Tuesday night whether Baghdad will reopen its oil taps. He said the new resolution's mention of an earlier resolution that referred to the U.S.-British plan, "is not acceptable in principle.''
Nonetheless, Iraq appeared likely to resume oil exports soon. While Iraq sounded triumphant, Russia's U.N. Ambassador Sergey Lavrov said, "I don't believe it was a victory for anybody except for the humanitarian program continuation.'' The British & Americans would not concede defeat. "The real losers here are the Iraqi people,'' said acting U.S. Ambassador James Cunningham. "The revisions we have proposed would facilitate trade and accelerate commerce and they would improve the lot of Iraq's people.''

He said London & Washington will use the coming months to press ahead with their plan and try to sway Russia. "We have made considerable progress and come too close to agreement to concede the field to Baghdad,'' Cunningham said. "We've won a lot of the battles in this process. We haven't yet won the war. But we're going to continue to go forward.'' Russia isn't giving up, either. Lavrov said Moscow's rival resolution to hasten an end to Iraqi sanctions remains on the council table. The Russian resolution would suspend sanctions on civilian goods once U.N. weapons inspectors certify that a long-term program to monitor Iraq's weapons programs is fully deployed.
"We expect the members of the council to come back to it as soon as they are ready,'' he said, stressing that Russia believes any new Iraq policy must include "very specific criteria on suspending and lifting sanctions'' in conjunction with a resumption of U.N. weapons monitoring.

Under council resolutions, sanctions imposed after Saddam Hussein's 1990 invasion of Kuwait cannot be lifted until U.N. inspectors certify that Iraq has dismantled its weapons of mass destruction & long-range missiles. Weapons inspectors left Iraq ahead of U.S.-British airstrikes in Dec. 1998 and Baghdad has barred their return. The Iraqi government maintains that it has eliminated its weapons programs and has demanded the immediate lifting of sanctions. Britain's U.N. Amb. Jeremy Greenstock said "there might be more credibility'' to Russia's approach if Moscow could persuade the Iraqi government to accept U.N. inspectors. In the meantime, he said, it was "illogical'' to block humanitarian improvements for the Iraqi people.

JOIN DELEGATION TO IRAQ Sanctions Challenge IV
1.16.01   Ship Medicine to Challenge Genocide

Bellicose Saddam jangles world nerves
Few believe Saddam still harbors enough military might to seriously trouble Kuwait shielded by US & UK
9.19.00   AFP English

DUBAI   With a finely timed accusation that Kuwait is stealing Iraqi oil, Saddam Hussein has set Western & Gulf nerves jangling once again. It took only a brief statement from Iraq's Oil Minister Amer Rashid last Thursday to ignite fears in Kuwait of a new war over the emirate's oil riches. The same accusation sparked the 1990 invasion of Kuwait, taking the world by surprise.
This time U.S. & Kuwaiti leaders immediately fired off warnings of grave consequences if Iraq's belligerency spills over. But Iraq has defiantly repeated the charges daily and warned it will take "adequate measures" to protect its rights and estimated the theft at 300,000 barrels per day.

    [ The U.S. is poisoning your water in violation of the Geneva Convention which kills a million of your kids, U.N. arms inspectors plant covert espionage devices under pretense of disarmament, neighbor Iran harbors wildcat rebels shooting 122mm rounds into your citizens' homes, neighbor Turkey flies twice weekly airstrikes whenever it pleases and neighbor Kuwait steals slant-drilled oil.
    Wouldn't you be "bellicose" ? ]
Iran rockets hit Baghdad, houses wrecked, wounding one
9.17.00   Reuters

Iraq: 311 killed in US, UK raids since 1998
8.28.00   Reuters

Between the attack in December 1998 and the present, a total of 18,607 sorties by raiding US & British warplanes in the south of Iraq killing 311 citizens & 927 wounded.

Turkey admits Iraqi air raid, probes casualty claims
Ankara said military operations started only after measures were taken to prevent any harm to civilians in the Kurdish-held enclave
8.18.18   AFP

ANKARA   Turkey admitted Friday that it had launched an operation against Turkish Kurdish rebels in northern Iraq and said it was investigating claims by Iraqi factions in the area that civilians were killed in the strike."Turkey carries out operations in northern Iraq from time to time as part of the combat against the terrorist Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK)," a spokesman for the Turkish foreign ministry, Huseyin Dirioz, said. Dirioz said such military operations started only after measures were taken to prevent any harm to civilians in the Kurdish-held enclave. "In a similar operation on the 15th of August, necessary measures were taken once again to ensure that the civilian population would not be harmed," Dirioz said.

  Saddam is itching to test another Bush
  Iraq resists the U.S. push for 'smart sanctions'
  7.2.01   Kevin Whitelaw & Mark Mazzetti U.S. News & World Report

Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein did not wait long to challenge the new Bush administration. Responding to an American plan to create "smart sanctions," Iraq promptly turned off the spigot on the bulk of its oil exports. Saddam's envoys are touring capitals in a campaign to intimidate countries into opposing the U.S. plan. Iraq's military is on alert, while Baghdad is touting a reward for military personnel who shoot down U.S. or British jets patrolling the no-fly zones. "We are approaching a new confrontation," Saddam warned his people earlier this month. This time, Saddam clearly means business. He has spent the past several years chipping away at the decade-old sanctions regime and is eager to destroy it. He has billions of dollars in the bank. And he has rarely been so popular in the Arab world, with his support of the Palestinian intifada. Emboldened, Saddam is pledging to withhold his oil until Washington backs down. The showdown begins this week when the United Nations holds a public debate on the U.S. plan. "It's a game of chicken," says one U.S. government analyst. "He is ready to stick it out for the long term." Officials believe he can hold out through 2001.

Failing sanctions
The current administration came into office eager to polish off the enemy that many of them faced in the Gulf War, when the elder George Bush was president. The first order of business: salvaging a failing sanctions regime. "Everybody knows that he can smuggle through the Jordanian and Syrian borders a whole herd of elephants and the Americans will know about it only when satellites spot the elephants grazing in the Baghdad amusement park," says Amatzia Baram, a leading Iraq expert at the University of Haifa.

Secretary of State Colin Powell's answer was "smart sanctions." The idea has strong intellectual appeal: Free up more goods to reach Iraqi civilians, while tightening controls on weapons-related materials and restricting Iraq's revenues from oil smuggling. But the reality is that new restrictions are likely unworkable. Tightening the embargo depends on Iraq's neighbors, many of whom are heavily reliant on Iraqi trade and oil. Take Jordan, which is known to be a busy corridor for smuggling into Iraq. The tiny nation receives its entire oil supply from Iraq at heavily discounted rates. An additional $450 million in exports to Iraq is a crucial stimulus for its weak economy. If Jordan clamps down on its border monitoring, Saddam has explicitly threatened to cut off the cheap oil and buy goods elsewhere. Going along with the U.S. plan "would be suicidal," says a Jordanian official.
The U.N. resolution only pares down the list of goods that Iraq cannot purchase under the oil-for-food program. New monitoring procedures are left to a later date. With Russia opposed, the plan's fate is uncertain. But even if it passes, the odds are that Washington will end up relaxing the sanctions without getting any corresponding tightening. So far, Saddam's oil cutoff has had little effect on world markets, mostly because Saudi Arabia pledged to fill the gap. "There seems to be little likelihood that Iraq can exercise political leverage by toying with the oil market," says James Placke of Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

Where he could score politically would be in shooting down a U.S. fighter jet patrolling the no-fly zone. U.S. military officials have seen a marked increase in the accuracy of Iraqi air defenses in recent months. U.S. News has learned that the White House is concerned that the no-fly operation is not having much effect on Saddam's behavior. As part of a broader review, officials are looking for new targets they could hit to inflict more pain on the regime. The most controversial part of U.S. policy remains its commitment to effecting a change of regime. U.S. officials are sending an additional $6 million to the Iraqi National Congress, mostly to create a radio station to broadcast to Iraq. But in a conclusion many Western govts share, Israeli security sources dismiss Iraqi opposition groups as corrupt and ineffective, finding Saddam's grip as firm as ever.

UN   U.N. Security Council members reached broad agreement on Monday to drop for 5 or 6 months a revamp of sanctions against Iraq and extend the current oil-for-food program without changes, diplomats said.. China's U.N. Ambassador Wang Yingfan told reporters that an "extension was agreeable for every council member but whether it is five or six months, we will have to consult with other council members." China holds this month's Security Council's presidency. Russia has objected to a U.S.-British resolution that would ease sanctions on civilian goods but spell out "dual use" supplies that could be utilized for military and civilian purposes. It would also seek to stop smuggling of goods by Iraq, estimated at $1 billion a year. The overhaul of the sanctions procedures were to be put in the context of the U.N.-humanitarian oil-for-food program, which expires on Tuesday.

U.S. said it had to consult Washington before any final decision, which diplomats said concerned the length of the delay. "The British have proposed it and I have to consult Washington about it. We have not made a decision," U.S. rep. James Cunningham told reporters. But diplomats said Washington would have no choice but to drop putting the new plan to a vote immediately. The council has to vote on the U.N. oil-for-food program before it expires on Tuesday. Iraq cut off oil sales on June 4 in protest of the U.S.-British plan. British Amb. Jeremy Greenstock, who drafted the resolution on the new sanctions plan said discussions would continue but the current oil-for-food plan would be extended without any changes. Without mentioning Russia by name, he called the objections "unjustifiable, negative and national, but they are there. "
French Ambassador Jean-David Levitte said: "The idea is to adopt a rollover, neutral and to go on quietly with discussions on the substance." He said Britain had proposed the rollover and Russian Ambassador Sergei Lavrov agreed, without objections from other members.

… The oil-for-food program, an exception to the sanctions, allows Baghdad to export oil under U.N. supervision in order to buy humanitarian supplies to alleviate the suffering of ordinary Iraqis. But according to oil traders, in the past year Iraq has managed to sell considerable amounts of oil outside of the program as well as obtain kickbacks from some middlemen and oil firms. Iraq exports its crude under the oil-for-food program through two outlets -- the port of Ceyhan on the Turkish Mediterranean coast and the port of Mina-al-Bakr on Iraq's Gulf coast. Ships were ready to start loading crude at both outlets but had not done so by Thursday. A pipeline that brings Iraq's Kirkuk crude to Turkey and the Mediterranean market was shut down a month ago has not restarted, the officials said. AMMAN, Jordan   Iraq has launched an aggressive new effort to weaken the crippling sanctions imposed on it after the Persian Gulf War, encouraged by record oil prices, improving trade with its neighbours and growing opposition to the embargo in the Arab world and beyond. Iraq has been directly pressuring Jordan to break the embargo and has stoked tensions with Kuwait & Saudi Arabia in what analysts see as a reminder that it still has the capacity to disrupt regional stability and push rising world oil prices even higher. These moves have been particularly noticeable against a backdrop of protests across Europe over high fuel costs, election-year concern in the U.S. over oil prices that have topped $37 a barrel and forecasts of high heating oil prices this winter. UN   Iraq's Security Council allies stepped up their campaign against U.N. sanctions Thursday with proposals to cut the compensation fund for victims of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and delay a $16 billion payout to Kuwait's oil company. Maneuvering over the U.N. compensation fund for Gulf War reparations comes amid plans for more passenger flights by Russia & France into Baghdad. Flights are seen as new attempts by Iraq's friends to whittle away the decade-old embargo & tweak U.S. Challenge to sanctions expected to come to a head next week in Geneva. Beginning Sept. 26, committee of Security Council members decides whether to award $16 billion payout to Kuwait Petroleum Corp. from an account funded by proceeds from U.N. oil-for-food program that allows Iraq to sell unlimited amounts of oil provided that it uses the profits to buy humanitarian goods for its people suffering under sanctions. 30% diverted to compensate victims of Iraq's 1990 Kuwait invasion.

Several countries, incl Russia, France, China & Malaysia, believed to want to delay the payout Kuwait's oil company, which would represent largest award to a corporation since fund's inception. So far, the fund has paid out more than $8 billion. Iraq highly critical of compensation commission, accusing it of unfair practices and asserting that most claims, currently 2.6 million claims for a total of $320 billion, have no legal grounds. Some diplomats & analysts suggested Iraq's accusation last week that Kuwait was stealing its oil designed to put pressure on the commission to defer a decision on the Kuwait Petroleum Corp. claim.
French Amb.Jean-David Levitte Thursday told Security Council enormous payout to Kuwaiti company, at a time when oil companies are benefitting from record high oil prices, was unconscionable at a time when Iraqis are suffering from sanctions. He proposed the council consider reducing money diverted into the compensation account from 30¢ to 20¢ & proceeds used to buy more humanitarian goods, a proposal backed by Russia & Tunisia, Western diplomats said.

This week team of intl oil experts working on behalf of UN secretary general completed a survey of Iraq's oil industry suffering the effects of nine years of UN sanctions imposed after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Deficiencies in the process that allows Iraq to import limited quantities of oilfield equipment & services, to sustain a creaking industry whose exports are needed to finance the multi-billion-dollar UN humanitarian aid programme, were high on their list of priorities. Oil ministry officials in Baghdad say the UN team was generally sympathetic to the plight of Iraq's oil industry, but there is deep scepticism about whether even a glowing report from the experts will ease the situation.

Baghdad claims U.S. & U.K. deliberately undermined provisions in the process. Non-oil contracts, covering such areas as power generation and water purification equipment, have also fallen victim to concerns, again mainly from the US and UK, over their potential "dual use". Rarely in the history of sanctions has the international community been faced with devising a system that sustains and improves strategic civilian industries while ensuring that a still extensive military machine does not become an unintended beneficiary.
Iraqi officials are especially critical of US and British representatives on the Security Council's so-called "661 Committee", which controls the flow to Iraq of foreign-made spare parts and equipment under the UN oil-for-food programme. "Out of 377 contracts put on hold by the 661 Committee, 343 are on hold because of objections from the US representative," according to a senior ministry official. A further 28 are on hold because of objections by both the US and UK, and four because of British objections only. Representatives from the other Security Council members have asked that only a total of two contracts be put on hold.

3.28.01 UNIKOM SecGen rpt
DMZ developments. Also reports on organizational matters & financial aspects of UN Iraq-Kuwait Observation Mission (UNIKOM). Incl observations &. 3.01 UNIKOM deployment map

9/24/00 "U.N. Arms Inspectors Will Not Return to Iraq"
Colum Lynch Washington Post pA22
U.N.   U.S. and British diplomats conceded today that they had failed in a week-long, high-level effort to gain support in the U.N. Security Council for a proposal to send international weapons inspectors back into Iraq. The impasse spells the indefinite continuation of economic sanctions on Baghdad, along with a low-intensity U.S. bombing campaign and an Iraqi ban on international inspectors. … In an attempt to restart the inspections, Britain and the Netherlands circulated a resolution to create a new arms control agency to replace the United Nations Special Commission, or UNSCOM. U.S. officials said Russia & China refused to support that proposal without assurances that economic sanctions would be lifted.

designer destabilization by the West
9/14/00 U.N. favored status of Oil for Food proceeds to autonomous Kurds Chicago Tribune

Child malnutrition in iraq 'unacceptably high' as drought, lack of Investment aggravate food and nutrition situation
9.13.00
UN Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Food Programme
The report points out that malnutrition is often due to factors other than insufficient food, poor water (both in quality and quantity) and poor sanitation are key causes of repeated infections resulting in infant and child malnutrition. Infections in infants are associated with the decline in breast-feeding, the early introduction of infant formula and an increase in bottle-feeding. The report calls for the maintenance and rehabilitation of the water and sanitation system as a priority for meeting basic needs as well as nutrition and health education to promote best practices in health, food and nutrition including support for breast-feeding.
While highlighting the UN's latest efforts to improve the effectiveness of the Oil-for-Food Programme, the report recommends speeding up the process for approving Oil-for-Food contracts and ensuring the timely delivery of humanitarian imports, including food and medicine. The report also recommends more inputs for the rehabilitation of agriculture, particularly seeds and materials for water conservation and irrigation management.

9/8/00 U.N. Office of the Iraq Programme Oil for Food
"The Special Rapporteur criticized the Govt for " letting innocent people suffer while [it] maneuvered to get sanctions lifted." Had the Government not waited 5 years to adopt the oil-for-food program in 1996, he stated in October, " millions of innocent people would have avoided serious and prolonged suffering."
US State Dept. 1999 Human Rights Report re Iraq
2/8/00 BBC Online   "How long the civilian population, which is totally innocent on all this, should be exposed to such punishment for something that they have never done?" Hans von Sponeck
before resigning as second UN AsstSecGeneral & Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq

10/15/98 The Independent   "We are in the process of destroying an entire society. It is as simple and terrifying as that. It is illegal and immoral." Denis Halliday
after resigning as first UN AsstSecGeneral & Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq

U.N. Security Council Resolution 986 authorizes the sale of $5.2 billion (U.S.) worth of Iraq oil for each 6 month period. Every oil contract must be approved by the sanctions committee.

4/24/00 Rep Tony Hall Iraq trip

3/00 Congressional Staffers Delegation Trip Report

2/1/00 Conyers/Cambell letter, letter signed by 70 US Representatives asking Pres.Clinton to lift Iraq economic sanctions on Iraq. AIPAC-sponsored "keep the sanctions" letter in response & its signatories "AIPAC letter contains number of factual errors therefore not a reliable source."

10/20/97 Economic Sanctions to Achieve U.S. Foreign Policy Goals discussion & guide to current law Congressional Research Service

Madeleine Albright: 8/4/00 on Iraq
When asked in a 5/96 CBS interview in May 1996 about the estimated million deaths of Iraqi children, stated: "I think this is a very hard choice but the price - we think the price is worth it."
3/26/97 first major foreign policy address as Secretary of State: "We do not agree with the nations who argue that if Iraq complies with its obligations concerning weapons of mass destruction, sanctions should be lifted. Our view, which is unshakable, is that Iraq must prove its peaceful intentions … And the evidence is overwhelming that Saddam Hussein's intentions will never be peaceful."

3/24/00 US Ambassador Jas.Cunningham defence of U.S. policy in Security Council. Cunningham is U.N. DeputyRep. Rep. R.Holbrooke has avoided statements on Iraq.

Sanctions per State Dept Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs
pdf Iraqi Sanctions per Treasury Dept Office of Foreign Assets Control
1999 Human Rights ¹ & Terrorism reports re Iraq   profile

¹   "For the sixth year, the Government held 3-week training courses in weapons use, hand-to-hand fighting, rappelling from helicopters, and infantry tactics for children from 10 to 15 years of age. Camps for these " Saddam Cubs" operated throughout the country. Senior military officers who supervised the course noted that the children held up under the " physical and psychological strain" of tough training for as long as 14 hours each day. Sources in the Iraqi opposition report that the army found it difficult to recruit enough children to fill all of the slots in the program. Families reportedly were threatened with the loss of their food ration cards if they refused to enroll their children in the grueling course. The Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq reported in October that authorities were denying food ration cards to families that failed to send their young sons to Saddam Cubs compulsory weapons-training camps. Similarly, authorities reportedly withheld school examination results to students unless they registered in the Feddayin Saddam organization."
DoD photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Wm G. Lewis USN

Iraq debt collection ~ »
2/3/00 Russia demands seized tanker's immediate release
MOSCOW
CNN   Russia on Thursday demanded the immediate release of a tanker seized in the Persian Gulf by the U.S. Navy on suspicion of violating the U.N.-imposed oil embargo on Iraq. "The Russian side resolutely insists the tanker is immediately released," Interfax news agency quoted Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Vasily Seredin as saying. Russia had "expressed its puzzlement" to the United States and the United Arab Emirates over the incident, Seredin said. Sailors from the cruiser USS Monterey boarded the Russian ship Volgonef on Wednesday without resistance from its captain or crew, a senior U.S. official told CNN. The deputy minister, echoing earlier remarks by Transport Minister Sergei Frank, said the tanker was carrying Iranian fuel oil. "The vessel never entered Iraqi territorial waters or Iraqi ports," he said.
DoD photo by StaffSgt. D.W. Richards USAF

5/19/99 "Russia Wants Iraq Sanctions Ended" Nicole Winfield
U.N AP - Russia, China and France suggested Wednesday that the Security Council suspend sanctions on Iraq once a new arms monitoring system is in place, part of a new round of negotiations on drafting a new U.N. policy for Baghdad. The United States immediately rejected the proposal and said it would instead consider an alternative draft resolution submitted Tuesday by Britain and the Netherlands which calls for foreign investment in Iraq's oil sector after U.N. arms inspections resume.

1/26/98 "Russia expects and opposes military strike against Iraq"
In a statement to London-based al-Hayat daily issued on Sunday A high-ranking Russian official expects Iraq to receive a US-British military strike targeting military positions after Eid al-Fitr, adding that the strike will be carried out without legitimate international approval.

6/2000 Iraq: A Decade of Devastation Middle East Report 215
"And They Called It Peace" US Policy on Iraq Phyllis Bennis Institute for Policy Studies cf ¶22

As of the spring of 2000, the US-led sanctions remain in place. But changes are undeniably afoot. The passage of Security Council resolution 1284 provides a useful indication: it did not qualitatively change the devastating impact of the existing economic sanctions (that failure led von Sponeck to resign shortly after its passage). It tinkers with the sanctions regime, creates a new arms monitoring agency and considers, more than a year down the line, the possibility that some economic restrictions might be temporarily suspended. But economic sanctions remain the default position, unless the Council, including the US, affirmatively votes to keep them suspended after each four-month period. Under such restrictions, no oil company worth its stockholders is likely to risk large-scale investment in Iraq, however much they may covet Iraq's oil wealth. Without such investment, repair and reconstruction of the oil industry itself will remain impossible, and Iraq's poverty will only deepen.
Even with those limitations, it is certain that 1284 could not have passed US muster as recently as two years ago. Ironically, it has long been clear that the sanctions policy holds no strategic value. Until the last few months, there was no political constituency (except the Kuwaiti royal family) demanding that economic sanctions remain in place. The refusal even to consider lifting sanctions reflected craven political concerns: the US couldn't appear "soft on Saddam Hussein."

In early spring 2000, the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) suddenly seized the pro-sanctions mantle. Until that time AIPAC had largely avoided the fray, deeming Iran a far more serious potential threat to Israel than Baghdad's degraded military. In February 2000, after a congressional letter had called on President Clinton to lift the economic sanctions, AIPAC, by some reports at the urging of the White House, began a campaign supporting a "keep the sanctions" letter initiated by Rep. Tom Lantos, chair of the House Human Rights Caucus. By December 1999, US policy faced isolation, both domestically and internationally. In the UN, only the British remained qualitatively supportive. The Netherlands, with a new foreign minister from the conservative Liberal Party, moved to defend the US-UK alliance, with half-hearted support from dismayed Dutch diplomats. But support for sanctions was fraying. Resolution 1284 squeaked by with permanent members France, China and Russia, as well as Malaysia, abstaining.
France, Russia and China were unwilling to spend the requisite political capital to veto 1284. But, as the Wall Street Journal described it on May 1, now it was "unclear which side is more isolated: the dictator who has successfully defied sanctions, or the Anglo-US alliance that insists they remain in place." In that context, the growing domestic opposition took on new visibility. In 1999 Congressman John Conyers had sent a letter to Clinton signed by 40 of his colleagues, calling for a "delinking" of economic and military sanctions against Iraq. Earlier that year, during a speaking tour sponsored by major peace, faith-based and Arab-American organizations, this writer and former UN Humanitarian Coordinator Denis Halliday spoke to over 10,000 people directly, and reached hundreds of thousands more through op-eds, radio and TV interviews in 22 cities. But results would take a while longer.

In the summer of 1999, the first group of congressional staff traveled to Iraq to examine the impact of sanctions. All but one represented members of the Progressive Caucus of the House; three were also members of the Congressional Black Caucus. By spring 2000 the latest congressional letter had 71 signatures, and demanded economic sanctions be lifted. Democratic Whip and close Clinton ally David Bonior called the economic sanctions "infanticide masquerading as policy." Rep. Tony Hall, known as "Mister Hunger" for his twenty-year commitment to that issue, traveled to Iraq in April 2000 to examine the humanitarian conditions. He did not call for lifting the economic sanctions, but brought back a devastating critique of the sanctions and admitted that the US was the main problem within the UN's Sanctions Committee. By May 2000, Representatives Conyers and Cynthia McKinney called for an official congressional delegation to Iraq.

"The Cuban and Iraqi instances make it abundantly clear that economic sanctions are, at their core, a war against public health. Our professional ethic demands the defense of public health. Thus, as physicians, we have a moral imperative to call for the end of sanctions. Having found the cause, we must act to remove it. Continuing to allow our reason to sleep will produce more monsters."
New England Journal of Medicine (Editorial), 24 April 1997

3/22/99 "Sanctions as Siege Wafare" Joy Gordon The Nation

Spider's Web Secret History of How White House Illegally Armed Iraq Alan Friedman Fin.Times London (1994, Bantam)
Shell Game Peter Mantius (1995, St. Martin's Press)
Evidence is clear U.S. assisted Iraq in obtaining cluster bombs, nuclear enrichment technology, U.S. designed munitions, missile technology, $5billion in loan guarantees & much more in spite of Saddam's open hatred of U.S. and his wanton use of poison gas against his own civilian population.

Islamic news   1
IViews   MidEast Mirror newspaper

Bay of Pigs metaphor
Intl Herald Tribune 2.26.98
Osama bin Laden


presented by §
OCIAL
JUSTICE  
Jewelry Directory | Pro-Built Construction | Link Trade Forum | Beaded Necklace | PPO Vs. HMO