House of Reps proceedings 10 October 1996

| Howe (ALP) | Blunt (NP) | history project | CSAWatch main page |

Title: HVP No. 123 6 CHILD SUPPORT-PAPER AND MINISTERIAL STATEMENT
Date: 8 October 1986
Source: House
6 CHILD SUPPORT-PAPER AND MINISTERIAL STATEMENT
Mr Howe (Minister for Social Security) presented the following paper:
Child support-Discussion paper on child maintenance by Cabinet Sub-Committee on Maintenance, dated October 1986-
and, by leave, made a ministerial statement in connection with the paper.
Mr Blunt, by leave, also made a statement in connection with the matter.

| Howe (ALP) | Blunt (NP) | history project | CSAWatch main page |

Title: REFORM TO CURRENT CHILD MAINTENANCE ARRANGEMENTS: Paper and Ministerial Statement
Date: 8 October 1986
Speaker: Howe The Hon B.L. (BATMAN, SOCIAL SECURITY, ALP, Government)
Source: House

Mr HOWE (Batman-Minister for Social Security) ;For the information of honourable members, I present a discussion paper on reform to current child maintenance arrangements. I seek leave to make a statement.

Leave granted.

Mr HOWE ;This paper is being released to assist consultations with major organisations which have an interest in the proposed reforms. The paper outlines the Government's proposed directions for reform which were announced in the Budget context and raises a number of issues on which it will be seeking community views. The issues on which views are particularly sought include: firstly, how best to determine the capacity to pay of non-custodial parents and the formula for determining the level of payments; secondly, whether there should be maximum or minimum payments; thirdly, whether the custodial parent's financial circumstances should be considered, and if so, how; fourthly, on what grounds should people be able to have the formula departed from; fifthly, how to treat custodial parents if they refuse to provide information about the non-custodial parent; sixthly, the relationship between maintenance and social security payments; seventhly, the relationship between maintenance and property; and finally, whether any circumstances justify any link between access and maintenance.

The discussion paper not only will be useful in the consultation process but also should assist organisations and individuals wishing to make submissions to the Government on the proposed changes to child maintenance arrangements. Consultation will occur from now until the end of November, whereupon the Government will be in a position to finalise details of its new child support scheme.

I believe that the discussion paper makes clear the position that the Government has taken on the overall question of maintenance and child support. I believe that the paper will be of great interest. We are certainly very anxious to involve discussion across a broad spectrum of views. We hope that we can achieve in this Parliament considerable agreement around the question of child support. Previous debates, especially in the other place, have shown that there is very broad support across parties for reform in this area. I commend the paper to the House.

| Howe (ALP) | Blunt (NP) | history project | CSAWatch main page |

Title: REFORM TO CURRENT CHILD MAINTENANCE ARRANGEMENTS: Paper and Ministerial Statement
Date: 8 October 1986
Speaker: Blunt Mr C.W. (RICHMOND, NP)
Source: House

Mr BLUNT (Richmond) ;by leave-I agree with the Minister for Social Security (Mr Howe) that there is broad bipartisan support for the need for reform in child support in Australia at present. I welcome the tabling of the discussion paper, as superficial as it may be. I do not intend to comment at length now about the contents of the paper because, as the Minister and the House know, we have had the paper for only about two hours during the suspension of the sitting for lunch and in Question Time. I note that it is not the first paper that has been tabled in this place dealing with maintenance collection in Australia. I regret that the Minister has made no reference to the 400-page report dealing with maintenance collection in Australia that was tabled in 1984. The paper that has been tabled today was prepared as a result of the appointment of a consultant. The appointment was made some 10 months ago. As a result of 10 months work, we have 41 pages of substantive report, plus appendixes.

I regret that the Minister, in today's statement, made no attempt to explain the Government's philosophy in making a Press statement prior to the Budget, which created the impression in the Australian public's mind that action in this area was imminent and that many supporting parents in Australia could rely on the Government in the near future to do something about their difficulties in obtaining maintenance support from their former partners. I am sure that the Minister is just as aware as I am that many people anticipated prompt action and, in fact, deferred pursuing legal remedies of their own in anticipation that his Government and his Department, through the Australian Taxation Office, would be acting immediately to come to grips with the problem that exists.

I am also concerned that there is a conflict between the Minister's statement released as part of the Budget, which shows that the Government's proposals will not affect those people who have effective maintenance collection arrangements at present. However, on my readings of the report tabled today, the Government anticipates that the scheme will be extended to all children in Australia. I hope that in the coming discussions the Minister will make clear to all Australians exactly what the Government's intentions are in this area. Celebrity Pictorials & Gossip | Blinds | Jewelry Directory | Asterisk Voip Services | Robs PC